Social Media Influence isn’t About Popularity, It’s Contextual
Nobody cares what I say about cheese
There are at least three questions you should ask yourself before engaging online with influential thought leaders in your target market.
1. Which topical communities should I be looking at?
2. Who do the people inside of those communities respect most and listen to?
3. What can I do for those people?
Remember the old saying “9 out of 10 dentists recommend?” If you’re looking for information about the dental field, ask the dentists – not the neuroscientists or the cheese mongers.
Little Bird will answer for you, or help you answer, all of those 3 questions.
Contextual Connections Are Key
If I’m looking for top experts and influencers in the field of Neuroscience, what matters most is how many other neuroscience experts pay attention to someone I’m looking at engaging with.
Consider neuroscience writer Oliver Sacks, author of books like Musicophilia and The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat.
Sacks is a generally popular author, but do other neuroscientists pay attention to him? By analyzing his connections online, we can see that he’s won the attention of other thought leaders in the field like Vaughan Bell, Marsha Lucas and Micah Allen, among many other neuroscience specialists.
That’s super relevant, it’s contextual, it makes sense that we count those connections in evaluating his influence in the world of Neuroscience. (Incidentally, Sacks doesn’t follow any of those three people back yet – but I’ve tweeted to him about it and perhaps he will!)
Irrelevant Followers Are Irrelevant
Oliver Sacks is also followed on Twitter by Rebecca Siegel, who is a cheese maker and goat herder in Vermont. That’s cool, but is it relevant to evaluating his influence in the world of neuroscientists? No.
On the other hand, if I wanted to know about cheese, Rebecca Siegel’s judgement would be very important. She’s won the ear of leaders in the cheese industry like Marcella Wright and Tia Keenan. Almost 100 other cheese industry leaders online follow Siegel on Twitter – which we understand means she’s a very important player in that field. Her opinion about neuroscience probably isn’t relevant though.
That’s why we believe that connections out of context, or even absolute popularity with the general public, are not the best way to evaluate someone’s influence in a particular field.
We believe that in-group validation is the best metric. It’s made even more valuable because it cannot be gamed, or cheated. There’s no way you’re going to win the attention of a whole bunch of neuroscience leaders without being pretty darned interesting. Thus, working backwards, seeing who has won the attention of a bunch of neuroscientists is a good way to find out who neuroscientists find interesting.
We at Little Bird perform all this social network analysis faster, better and cheaper than any other system you’ll find. We’ll lead you to the door of the top cheese mongers, neuroscientists or anyone else you like. Then we’ll help you figure out what you can do for them, too. That’s the subject of another post.